Modern Rodding Tech
InTheGarageMedia.com
Pontiac Tri-Power 428 on dyno, dual Rochester carbs and turquoise valve covers tuned for performance
1. Your choice, four-barrel or Tri-power, to deck out your large-inch Pontiac V-8.
Plenty of Poncho Potential
Testing Tri-Power & a Four-Barrel on a Pontiac 428 Stroker Stretched to 467 Cubes
By Barry Kluczyk Photography by THE AUTHOR
O

f all the iterations of Pontiac’s V-8 engine family, the 428ci version doesn’t get much attention. That’s not without reason, as the 389, 400, and 455 mills were admittedly the “hot ones” to borrow a classic Pontiac tagline.

The 428 also had a relatively short shelf life, produced only for the 1967-69 model years, which means they are quite rare finds these days. While rated at up to 390 hp, they were designed to deliver low-end torque for the heavier fullsize cars and weren’t installed in the GTO or Firebird. However, numerous dealer-sponsored swaps to the larger engine were made in the traditional muscle cars.

At its core, the 428 was a bored-out 421 with the same 4.000-inch stroke. It was replaced by the 455 in 1970, which increased the bore slightly and added a 4.210-inch stroke. The relative abundance of 455-core engines and the more conventional 400-inch Pontiac engines make purpose-built performance versions of the 428 quite rare. However, the interchangeable parts within the Pontiac V-8 family make building one easier and relatively more affordable. By that, constructing one is costlier than a Chevy engine, but not in the same league as the Boss 429 or Street Hemi.

Locating a buildable 428 is probably the biggest challenge these days, but luck was on the side of Todd Ryden, who knew someone with a 428 block he no longer needed. That set in motion the plans to use it as the foundation for a restomod engine that would power Ryden’s 1965 Tempest. However, achieving that power goal through natural aspiration would require more than a simple camshaft swap and touching the heads, so a plan was devised to bore and stroke the engine to enhance its cylinder volume and, consequently, its airflow capability.

A 0.060-inch overbore, and a long 4.250-inch stroke will deliver a 467ci displacement, complemented by a set of Edelbrock aluminum heads patterned after the original Ram Air IV design and a Comp Cams camshaft with over 0.500-inch lift and a relatively tight lobe separation angle. This setup provides enough valve overlap to give the engine an authoritative rumble at idle.

The big-inch Poncho would also serve as the basis for a side-by-side shootout between Pontiac’s classic Tri-power induction system and a tried-and-true four-barrel carburetor. It’s no secret that a well-tuned single four-barrel will generally outmuscle the six-barrel setup of the Tri-power, but we wanted to see for ourselves with this big-inch displacement—and Ryden was up for the comparison test.

“No matter what the results, the Tri-power will still end up as the induction system of choice,” Ryden says. “This engine isn’t about maximum power. I want some eyeball appeal to go with it.”

Agreed. Style counts for a street driver, and the Tri-power setup draws the eyeballs on Saturday morning at the local cars-and-coffee meetup.

Regardless of the induction system, it’s worth noting that whether in its stock displacement or the stroker setup of this project, the 428 not only makes a solid starting point for a strong street engine, but most of the parts, including the rotating assembly, are interchangeable with Pontiac’s 455 engine. For this build, most of the parts were sourced from Summit Racing Equipment.

So, how did the stroker 467 perform? After priming the assembled engine, it was started, brought up to 2,400 rpm, and held there for about 20 minutes to break in the cam and lifters. After that, the engine was powered through a number of light loads and rpm to season all the mechanical pieces and help seat the rings. Here’s a quick look at some of the finer points behind the dyno setup:

A set of 1.75-inch Hedman Husler headers were used for testing

An MSD distributor was used, and the springs were swapped. MSD assembles their distributors with heavy—and therefore slow—springs. A change to the lightest springs brought the advance in quickly (full advance by 1,800 rpm). Also, before installing the distributor, the gear was coated thoroughly with the supplied break-in lube

After the initial break-in, the spark plugs and valve covers were pulled for inspections—and then given the go-ahead for full-power pulls.

With the engine tuned, warmed up, and put against the water brake, the first couple of pulls netted about 470 hp. Not bad, but fiddling with carb jetting and timing, which ended up with 38 degrees of total advance, raised max power to 492 horses with the 750-cfm Holley four-barrel carburetor. The 500hp goal had not quite been achieved, but the stroked 428 also cranked out more than 550 lb-ft of torque, so there was little to complain about.

As expected, the Tri-power system came in with less maximum power and torque than the four-barrel: 477 hp and 545 lb-ft. It was still a respectable showing, and the 15 or so horses sacrificed in the name of style won’t be missed with all that torque on tap.

Ultimately, Ryden got exactly what he sought—an undeniably powerful engine with plenty of visual appeal. He also proved Pontiac power remains alive and well.

Factory casting shows “428” Pontiac block identifier, confirming displacement for Tri-Power build
2. The block had a casting number of 39792968 and a date code of November 1968. Further inspection and measurements indicated that the block remained at its original bore size. Naturally, the “428” casting also aided in identifying the engine.
Media-blasted Pontiac 428 block prepped for machining, ready for high-performance rebuild
3. The initial steps in the build involved a visit to an oven-bake followed by a trip to a blast tank to remove decades of accumulated grease and grime from the 428.
Cleaned and painted Pontiac 428 short block on stand, prepped for assembly
4. After verifying clearances and measurements, the final honing was completed, and the block was painted in a light Pontiac blue suitable for the 1965 Tempest for which the engine was intended. The bores and bearing surfaces were then meticulously wiped down and cleaned in preparation for assembly.
Camshaft being installed in Pontiac 428, pre-lubed for break-in procedure
5. The new hydraulic Comp camshaft (using the cam gear as leverage) is slid into the block. The specifications of 240/246-degree duration for intake and exhaust, 0.507/0.510-inch lift, and a tight 110-degree lobe separation angle will work perfectly on the street when paired with a manual transmission.
Precision-ground Pontiac 428 crankshaft with chamfered oil holes for improved flow
6. The rotating assembly came from Eagle (via Summit Racing). Understanding that the engine was designed more for street driving than for the strip, a few dollars were saved by choosing a cast steel crankshaft instead of a forged one. The cast crank is robust and provides a 4.25-inch stroke to increase the engine’s displacement. Note the nicely radiused oil passages on the main and rod journals and the larger-than-stock journal fillet, which enhances strength. Additionally, the first and fourth journals are drilled through to lighten the crank.
Crankshaft torqued in Pontiac 428 block, ARP fasteners used for bottom-end strength
7. The crank was carefully lowered into position with the main bearings set in the block. A quick spin was performed to ensure there were no interference issues, and afterward the main caps were installed. Yes, four-bolt mains would have been a nice upgrade, but the factory two-bolt mains will suffice for this street engine.
Forged Pontiac piston with domed relief for increased compression in performance builds
8. The Eagle rotating kit comes with forged flat-top pistons and wristpins made by SRP. With the engine’s selected Edelbrock heads, compression will be around 9.7:1, ensuring compatibility with pump gas.
Upgraded H-beam rod vs. OE I-beam Pontiac 428, stronger for high-RPM durability
9. At 6.800 inches, the H-beam rods in the engine kit are slightly longer than the stock length of 6.625 inches, which enhances the engine’s rod-to-stroke ratio. This is a crucial factor for stroker engines, as it minimizes the side-loading force on the thrust side of the piston, thus reducing friction.
Pressing wrist pins into Pontiac 428 pistons using connecting rods for Tri-Power setup
10. Here, the clearance is checked, and then the wristpin end of the connecting rod is honed to ensure accurate clearance while removing any “flares” or burrs.
Forged piston with valve reliefs installed into Pontiac 428 block using ring compressor
11. The pistons were installed smoothly—they tapped down into the holes without any issues. Note the position of the valve relief toward the top of the block, which is essential for preventing a potential interference nightmare when the engine is turned over for the first time.
Rod bolts torqued to spec during Pontiac 428 bottom-end assembly process
12. All the rod bolt threads were lubricated with ARP’s Moly Assembly Lube, including beneath the head of the bolt. They were then torqued to specifications, which completed the installation of the rotating assembly.
Windage tray fitted above crankshaft to reduce oil drag in Pontiac 428 engine
13. A windage tray was installed due to the increased volume of oil for lubrication expected from a planned Milodon oil pan. This will keep the oil in the pan away from the rotating crankshaft, which could whip it into a power-robbing froth.
Bolting windage tray in place as part of Pontiac 428 bottom-end prep
14. Crankshaft clearance must always be checked against a windage tray, especially in a long-swinging stroker combination. As it turned out, there were some interference issues as the crank rotated. Fortunately, washers placed on the studs served as effective spacers.
Milodon gold oil pan test-fitted to Pontiac 428 for increased capacity and control
15. The oil pan was bolted onto the block with the windage tray’s clearance confirmed. Milodon offers several versions for Pontiac engines, including a few road-race/Pro Touring designs with trap doors for improved oil control during turns. The version used for this engine features a shallow pan design, providing ample ground clearance while accommodating up to 8 quarts. This part can also be found on SummitRacing.com.
Timing gear being installed on Pontiac 428 camshaft for proper valve timing
16. Next, the necessary double-row timing chain set was installed on the crankshaft and camshaft, completing the short-block assembly.
Edelbrock Performer RPM aluminum head with dual valve springs and rocker hardware
17. Edelbrock provides several options for Pontiac heads, all made of lightweight aluminum: Performer, Performer RPM (round-port), CNC Performer RPM, and a Performer D-port head. The Performer RPM head was chosen for this engine.
Edelbrock head positioned onto Pontiac 428 block, matching performance with reliability
18. Installing an aluminum head is much easier on the back than a heavy factory cast-iron version. Each Edelbrock head weighs only about 37 pounds when assembled. A set of SCE’s “steel back” head gaskets was used with the new heads.
Fully installed Edelbrock aluminum head secured to Pontiac 428 with ARP fasteners
19. The Edelbrock Performer RPM head is based on the round-port Ram Air IV heads and is specifically designed to enhance airflow. It features 215cc intake runners that lead to 87cc combustion chambers with 2.11/1.66-inch valves. Edelbrock states it will flow 264 cfm at a 0.500-inch lift.
Final torque procedure underway on Pontiac 428 valvetrain for secure head installation

20. When installing the heads, the upper row of a set of ARP bolts was set to 105 lb-ft and the lower bolts were torqued to 95 lb-ft—all achieved in three even increments. It is always a good idea to re-torque the heads after initial start-up.

Mechanic installs a set of Comp Cams roller rocker arms
21. A set of Comp Cams roller rocker arms followed. They have an increased ratio of 1.65:1, which mechanically amplifies the cam’s lobe lift by positioning the pushrod closer to the fulcrum pivot point than the valve stem. This combination raises the cam lift to 0.558 inches on the intake side and 0.561 inches on the exhaust side.
The engine’s induction setup
22. The engine’s induction setup will be a classic Pontiac Tri-power system, however, its owner, Todd Ryden, also tested it with a single four-barrel. A deal was struck on a 1966 intake and center carb, which provides a performance advantage by offering equal-sized carb inlets. The primary inlet of the 1965 intake is smaller.
Mechanic tunes the linkage and set up the trio of carbs
23. Experienced Tri-power tinkerer Greg Ryden was called in to tune the linkage and set up the trio of carbs. The largest challenge for ensuring crisp throttle response and maximum performance is getting the secondaries to open quickly enough to prevent a lean mixture. With all that accomplished, the engine made 477 hp and 545 lb-ft.
The Tri-power manifold
24. For the comparison test, the Tri-power manifold was replaced with an Edelbrock Performer RPM intake. This high-rise design features a street-friendly dual-plane configuration and will be equipped with a Holley 4150-series dual-feed four-barrel rated at 750 cfm.
The completed four-barrel induction system

25. As expected, the four-barrel induction system delivered greater peak horsepower and torque: 492 hp and 552 lb-ft compared to the Tri-power. However, this engine wasn’t built for horsepower at all costs, and the Tri-power’s more than respectable performance will provide excellent street capability.

Dyno Chart
SOURCES
Modern Rodding
VOLUME 6 • ISSUE 59 • 2025